Open Learning 2.0? Aligning Student, Teacher and Content for Openness in Education. From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a “Post-Socialist” Age. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(2), 50–74.

Who are the Open Learners? A Comparative Study Profiling Non-Formal Users of Open Educational Resources. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1–10. Extending the Territory: From Open Educational Resources to Open Educational Practices. Knowledge Infrastructures and the Inscrutability of Openness in Education. Opening up education: A support framework for higher education institutions (EUR 27938). Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University, 15, 1–23.

From the “Digital Divide” to “Digital Inequality”: Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases. Jhangiani (Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science. From OER to Open Pedagogy: Harnessing the Power of Open.

The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). Dimensions of Openness: Beyond the Course as an Open Format in Online Education. Conceptualising OEP: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Literature in Open Educational Practices. Retrieved April 2, 2018, from Ĭronin, C., & MacLaren, I. Openness and praxis: Using OEP in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5). Institutional Culture and OER Policy: How Structure, Culture, and Agency Mediate OER Policy Potential in South African Universities. Examining the Open Movement: Possibilities and implications for education. Ĭape Town Open Education Declaration 10th Anniversary: Ten directions to move Open Education forward. A basic guide to Open Educational Resources (OER). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3). Bot-teachers in Hybrid Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A post-humanist experience.

Retrieved from īozkurt, A., Kilgore, W., & Crosslin, M. The aim of the new definition is to provide new language and a strong theoretical framework for equitable education, as well as to clearly distinguish the field of Open Education from mainstream constructivist eLearning.īeetham, H., Falconer, I., Mcgill, L., & Littlejohn, A. Finally, a new social justice aligned definition for Open Education is offered. Next the paper sets out findings which show where and how the principles of social justice became lost within the details of texts, or in other digital agendas and technological determinist debates. The paper begins by outlining the method of texts selection, including defining the three principles of social justice (redistributive, recognitive and representational justice) used as an analytical lens. A critical analysis of 19 texts was undertaken to track dominant and alternative ideas shaping the development of Open Education since 2002 as it broadened and developed from OER to Open Educational Practices (OEP). This paper investigates the degree to which recent digital Open Education literature is aligned to social justice principles, starting with the first UNESCO definition of Open Educational Resources (OER). Social justice, Open Education, Open Educational Resources, Open Educational Practices, OEP, critical theory, definition Abstract

Php course